|
|
Front Page
June Week Four
|
|
Invasion of Iraq: Agree or disagree with the policy, the Bush-Cheney administration
had achieved a major objective when Saddam Hussein allowed the U.N.
weapons inspectors complete access to all of Iraq. The inspections
were well underway to prove or disprove Iraqi claims that Iraq
had no nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons. The inspectors
had found nothing. Then, the
Bush-Cheney administration decided to invade Iraq anyway.
This week's
Rasmussen Poll
says American opinion is this: "49% Say Bush Responsible for Provoking Iraq War; 44% Say Hussein."
If the goal was to discover the banned weapons in Iraq, then
it was as good as done without war. Now the result is a
continual barrage of ugly stories and even more bizarre
government actions.
Invasion of America: A BBC
report
says:
"The most popular destination countries for migrants include the US - which alone is home to more than 20% of the world's migrants . . ."
Look at any major coastal city. For instance, in Miami, Florida
and San Francisco, California, most residents were not born in the United States.
Concerned about being a victim of electronic theft?
A Guardian report says, ". . .The call centre worker told
the Sun that he could sell as many as 200,000 account details a month." See
Indian call centre fraud. It also notes,
"More than 75% of IT services outside the US are now sourced from India."
No one will be surprised when our personal financial data is being
sold in the bazaars of the Middle East.
The New York Times reports on the wave of foreigners in the
universities:
"The issue is particularly acute in subjects like engineering,
where 50 percent of graduate students are foreign born,
and math and the physical sciences, where 41 percent of
graduate students are, according to a survey by the Council of Graduate Schools, an association of 450 schools."
Students complain that they cannot understand the instructors due
to their language deficiencies. Then, again, what happened to
the Americans whose seats and jobs went to the foreigners?
The New York Times reports: "Even as it proceeds with layoffs of
up to 13,000 workers in Europe and the United States, I.B.M. plans to increase its payroll in India
this year by more than 14,000 workers, according to an
internal company document."
Here's an earlier
BBC report.
Marcus Courtney observed: "The winners are the richest
corporations in the world, and American workers lose."
India is said to have as many as 250 million workers with
a college degree.
If globalization is going to proceed at the direction of
global corporations, then here's the logical result:
Replace the entire U.S. workforce with better-educated people from
India.
One Solution: When in doubt, vote'em out!
Humor from a Chinese Factory:
Chen said, "That is probably so the Americans can return to buy more. Not even the badly translated
assembly instructions deter them. If I bought a kitchen
item that came with such poor Mandarin instructions, I would return the item immediately."
See the complete item in the
The Onion.
|
June Week Three
|
|
Paul Krugman made a
great find this week in his column. In sum, it's this:
- 1945: 75% of Americans want national health insurance.
- 2003: 72% of Americans want national health insurance.
What does that say? For 60 years, over two generations, Americans,
on a broad bi-partisan basis, have made it clear that we want national
health insurance. Even if you are one of the minority who might
oppose it, you too would ask yourself this. In a democratic
society, why would the Congress of the United States fail to
respond to the wishes of the people on a matter of this importance
to us? Who are our legislators working for? What can you do to fix the system?
For a full explanation of how the Congress turns their backs
on us to please the special money interests, see Jill Quadagno's
book One Nation Uninsured: Why the U.S. Has No National Health Insurance.
A review.
With the Countdown Clock
to the midterm elections showing just
16 months, only 19 percent of Americans say Congress shares
their priorities. That's according to this week's New York Times/CBS News
poll. If American citizens were united on health care as the ONLY
issue, then the poll would be a kind of predictor that sincere
support for universal national health care is the secret for
political winners in 2006. This "19 percent" Congress rating
makes it easy to picture a landslide ballot-box revolution with
most Democrats and Republicans being thrown out of office.
By that "19%" rating, the American people seem to be in the mood
to take no prisoners.
Off the Radar: Here is just a short list
of scary information about causes of so much illness:
Four leading health care groups, representing more than 300,000 public health professionals, filed a challenge to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) power plant mercury rule.
Read more in
Silent, Irreversible Brain Injuries to Children.
Hazardous phthalate content in plastics is a scientific wake-up call to parents and other living creatures to shun needless synthetic products and choose non-toxic alternatives. Read more in
New studies on plastics bode ill for human race.
The Health and Energy web site
has an easy-to-read summary of
many of the causes of our rising costs of treating increasing
rates of serious illness. It says,
"Since 1950, the overall cancer incidence has increased by 44 percent;
the incidence of breast cancer and male colon cancer by about 60 percent; testis, prostate and kidney by 100 percent; and other cancers, such as malignant melanoma, multiple myeloma and some lymphomas,
by over 100 percent."
Its source is
The Cancer Prevention Coalition.
As always, the solution is reached through information and
direct cooperation and action in your neck of the woods.
Think and act!
|
June Week Two
|
|
"He's a fool that makes
his doctor his heir." (Ben Franklin said that.) Like the doctor
who would be an heir, there is an enormous
conflict of interest between a corporation and its
employees. Is a society
that lets corporations control their benefits a fool?
The corporation's job is to make sales and reduce expenses.
The incentive for CEO's to dump health insurance and pensions is
a conflict of interest of the first order. The
Fair Deal
solution is to dump employer-based benefits completely.
Then, every person can have a secure financial foundation.
The benefits should be completely separate from the employer.
The employer and employee both contribute, but the citizens
control the benefits and the assets backing them up.
Look at a few of the problems we have now:
- 50 people die each day for lack of medical insurance.
That's 18,000 Americans per year, every year, with
no end in sight!
- Employers offer no health insurance at all.
- Employers offer no pension whatsoever.
- CEO decides to shift the costs to you.
- Anyone over 45 looking for a job may be rejected
due to severe extra cost of health insurance for
that person.
- Lose a job and lose your insurance.
- Promised pension goes up in smoke when company fails.
- 401-K is a failure as company does not offer one.
- Only 5% of employees make maximum use of 401-K.
- Health insurers refuse to insure your condition.
- Most people do not or cannot save enough money.
- People cannot afford health insurance.
- People who can afford health insurance don't buy it.
The current system, for too many people, assumes that
welfare and charity are a fact of life. Universal
health insurance and universal savings are a fabulous solution
to today's system in America. It's based on sharing risk through
insurance. For instance, check out the
retirement savings formula.
William Greider discusses one strategy for us to take
control of our financial security. That can include
both health insurance and retirement income:
" 'Voluntary' is a loser, as the past twenty years amply
demonstrated, because it gives companies controlling
leverage over what is possible. And even well-intentioned
executives will always have to choose
between the company's self-interest and its employees
(guess who usually loses).
Only the government has the reach and power to design and
oversee a pension system that truly serves all."
Take a look at Greider's article . . .
Riding Into the Sunset.
Greider makes numerous references to Robert Fogel's book,
The Fourth Great Awakening and the Future of Egalitarianism.
Ben Franklin also gets credit for the timely phrase, "God helps
them that help themselves."
The above Franklin quotes are from the Walter Isaacson biography,
Benjamin Franklin: An American Life.
Off the Radar: By just looking at the daily headlines,
we can miss wide-spread, systemic problems.
The New York Times' Joel Brinkley reports:
"The government also estimates that about 15,000 people are trafficked to the United States each year." Read more in
U.S. Faults 4 Allies Over Forced Labor.
Here's a shocking quote: "Indeed, as many as 55,000 patients
may have died as a result of taking Vioxx, which Merck
continued to advertise even while in possession of studies that showed that it greatly increased
the risk of heart attacks."
That loss of life is the equivalent of one major airplane
crashing each week for the past four years! Where IS the protection of the government? The Congress?
Huffington's answer . . .
"We are indeed governed by the most corrupt, irresponsible,
and unaccountable Congress."
Read more in
The Speech.
The Instant Runoff Solution:
By just looking at the daily headlines,
you will miss some highly significant ideas for solutions.
The Hundred Network Fair Deal promotes Instant Runoff voting.
Voters may rank candidates on the ballot according to the order of
preference
In a 3-way race, each voter gets to vote for their top choice as well as
a "second" choice. If no single candidate wins
a majority outright, the candidate with the least votes is set aside.
Then, the "second choice" votes of the losing candidate are counted.
The "runoff" is instant to determine the winner. Think of the
money that is saved by not having to hold a special second election
between the top two vote-getters.
Fair Vote highlights how the instant runoff system could be implemented.
Read more in:
Voter Choice Act.
TITLE II--INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING FOR FEDERAL ELECTIONS
Here are two additional endorsements of Instant Runoff voting.
See "Step 6" of the Sierra Club article:
10 Steps to Better Elections.
John McCain and Howard Dean are two of a legion of supporters.
Jesse Jackson says:
"Adopt instant-runoff voting to invite more participation and candidates, and encourage the development of a richer democracy." Read the entire
section:
Spread democracy in the United States first.
While we're on the subject of voting . . . Greg Palast says: "There's a nasty little secret of American democracy where 2 to 3 million votes are chucked out, you know, simply not counted after they're cast." Read more in
The Last Iconoclast.
What's next? What topic would you like to see on this site?
Send your suggestion via
email.
|
|
June Week One
|
|
Everything old is new again. And sometimes it's also totally modern. Here's the story.
Imagine that one or both of our major parties fell apart in 2006
and was no more within 4 years. Democratic Party? Poof.
Republican Party? Poof. That's what happened in the 1850's.
The Know Nothing movement put Know Nothing candidates on the ballots
of multiple parties, endorsed them, and voted on principle, not
party. The Whig Party went poof. The non-partisan issue
that lit the fuse was immigration. Today immigration is a
hot topic cutting across all party lines. The Know Nothings
knew a lot . . .
Click and go . . .
Speaking of immigration . . . there was one fact-based
review of the different estimates of the size of the problem.
This writer thought the number was 12 million illegal
aliens in the U.S. And,
a thousand more enter the country illegally each day. This
L.A. Times piece estimates as many as 20 million
illegals today!
Click and go . . .
And that brings us back to The
Hundred formula. You find 10 people who want to act together
to fix one or more shared problems. You know you've got a recruit
when your ten recruits each recruit 10 people. Now you've got
a Hundred. Here's a nonpartisan, nonconfrontational starting project.
Register voters in your bailiwick. What a great public service!
Let's say a hundred citizens, your Hundred, register a hundred
new voters. Voila! That's 10,000 new voters. Your Hundred could
do that in one day! And, you're providing a great service.
It's also called getting to know your neighbors. Just remember,
the Countdown Clock
is running.
Did you know that
Ben Franklin published the first political cartoon in
America?
You'll recognize its caption:
Join, or Die.
That was found in Walter Isaacson's biography titled
Benjamin Franklin: An American Life.
It will be interesting to see whether this week's OAS
meeting gets much coverage compared with the car chase of
the week. The Organization of American States story is really
two stories. The Miami Herald
says, "The last time the OAS General Assembly met in the United States, Richard Nixon was president, dictators and military juntas ruled in many of the member countries, the Panama Canal was ''owned'' by the United States, and spring breakers still reveled during wet T-shirt nights at the Button Lounge on the beach in Fort Lauderdale." Read the
national news version.
The second story on the ground is the opposition movement to
the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). If you loved NAFTA,
you'll love CAFTA. Ask people in Indiana how they felt about losing
120,000 good manufacturing jobs because of NAFTA. Here are web sites
that inform you about the second story of protests over this OAS
meeting:
Florida Fair Trade Coalition.
Public Citizen.
Sierra Club.
Events are moving very rapidly. What do you think is
most important? What feature would you like to see on this site?
Send your suggestion via
email.
Looking for information that's no longer on this page?
You'll find all previous Front Pages in the
Archive.
|
|
|